In line with government guidance, our staff are working from home and will now be helping you remotely wherever possible. Please get in touch with us and we’ll talk through how we can assist. Please note that to protect both our clients’ and employees’ health the office is shut to visitors.
At times a parent with care of the child may stop the other parent from having contact with the child for no other reason than what he or she has already argued in the past and the other parent feels they now have to bring enforcement proceedings because of a breach of the order. In that situation the Court is not going to tolerate a parent withholding contact for the same reasons that have been argued before and which the Court have already adjudicated upon. Unless there are any safeguarding factors that would affect the child adversely either physically, emotionally or morally, the Court adopt the stance that each parent should have a meaningful relationship with their child.
When making any decisions about the children their needs are of paramount concern to the Court. The Court take into account when making any decisions what is known as the Welfare Checklist:
The Court also needs to be satisfied that there is a need for an order rather than no order at all and in the best interest of the child.
Contact can be direct, indirect i.e. via cards, letters, texts, skyping, emails etc, can be supervised or unsupervised, dependant on the circumstances.
If despite there being a Contact Order in place there are difficulties in sustaining this due to the resident parent’s obstruction then the options are as follows:
If you have any queries about this, then please come and see our family law solicitor, Samantha Chater. You can contact her on 024 7653 1532 or email@example.com. Samantha has a wealth of family law experience and is an accredited member of both Resolution and The Law Society Children Panel.