In line with Government guidelines for safe working during the COVID pandemic, access to our office is strictly by a pre-arranged appointment only, and only where absolutely necessary. We are open for business with some staff working in the office and others from home, they can still be contacted in the usual way either by telephone or email.
In respect of your pre-arranged appointment, if you develop symptoms of COVID, or have in the last 14 days come into contact with someone with COVID or symptoms of, we ask that you contact the office by telephone/email to arrange a new appointment or discuss if there is an appropriate alternative to your meeting.
The safety of our staff and clients is of paramount importance to us and so thank you for your continued co-operation during these unprecedented times.
Mortgage contracts contain a clause that provides that should a borrower fail to make their scheduled payments, the lender can take possession of the property. Once they have possession, a sale will follow to repay the outstanding mortgage and costs. If there is a surplus, that will be paid to the borrower. If there is a deficit, which is unfortunately more often the case, the lender will seek to recover this sum against the borrower.
Before lenders can take possession of a property and sell it, they must first obtain a Court Order for possession. To do so, they must prove the following;
The Mortgage Possession Pre-Action Protocol (MPAP)
A pre-action protocol is a guide as to what parties should do prior to starting proceedings. The aim is to avoid unnecessary proceedings. Proceedings should be a last resort when all other attempts to resolve the situation have failed. The lender should consider whether it would be reasonable;
It is important to note two things about the protocol;
The protocol requires the exchange of information in such a way so as to make it easily understood; for example, if a lender is providing information to a borrower who may have difficulties in reading English, the lender should take reasonable steps to ensure the information is communicated in a way the borrower will understand.
Initially, when a borrower falls into arrears on their mortgage payments, the lender must provide the borrower with;
The lender must also advise the borrower to make early contact with the Housing Department of the local authority and refer them to sources of independent, free advice, such as the Citizen’s Advice Bureau (the CAB).
The lender and the borrower must take all reasonable steps to discuss with each other the cause of the arrears, the borrower’s financial circumstances and his proposals for the repayment of the arrears. A borrower should contact their lender as soon as there is a problem to inform them of the situation and see what assistance they can offer; the lender cannot be criticised for failing to help if the borrower did not make them aware of the problems they were facing.
The lender must consider any proposal from the borrower to either change the date or method of repayment, or indeed to clear the arrears. If the proposals are not acceptable, the lender must give reasons, in writing, as to why. If the lender submits a repayment proposal to the borrower, they must give them a reasonable period of time in which to consider the proposal.
If an agreement is reached but subsequently breached by the borrower, the lender must give the borrower 15 days notice to remedy the breach before proceedings will be commenced.
Finally, even if an agreement cannot be reached immediately, a lender must consider not starting a possession claim in the following circumstances;
In addition to making the claim, the borrower should also be able to demonstrate that he has provided all evidence required to process the claim, a reasonable expectation of eligibility for payment and an ability to pay the part of the mortgage not covered by the DWP or the insurer.
Further, if the borrower can show that he has taken or will take reasonable steps to market the property for sale at an appropriate price, the lender should consider postponing proceedings. The borrower should provide the lender with details of the marketing attempts.
If the borrower has made a complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service about a potential possession claim, the lender should consider postponing proceedings
If, despite the above situations occurring, the lender decides to commence proceedings, it must give the borrower of the reasons for this at least 5 business days before starting proceedings.
If no agreement can be reached between the parties, possession proceedings can be started. If the protocol has been followed, proceedings often only start if a borrower has not been actively trying to resolve the situation or where the borrower has insufficient resources.
The rules regarding possession claims are set out at Part 55 of the Civil Procedure Rules and the Practice Direction supplementing it.
The claim will often be for two things; an order for possession and a money judgment for the full amount outstanding under the mortgage.
The particulars of claim must be served with the claim form and must contain the following information;
If the claim is issued online, as most are, and the information set out at 9 above has been provided before the commencement of proceedings, the lender need only provide a summary in his particulars of claim to include;
If this is the approach taken, a full schedule must be served on the borrower not more than 7 days after the date of issue of the proceedings.
Once the claim is issued, a hearing date will be given. The borrower should attend. It is worth noting that, at any time, even after issue, it may be possible for the lender and the borrower to reach an agreement. If they do, the hearing may be adjourned or a suspended order, which will be discussed below, may be agreed.
Within 5 days of receiving notice of the hearing date, the lender must send a notice to the property address to the occupier, to the local authority housing department and to any registered proprietor of a registered charge over the property, which must state that a claim has started, the name and address of the parties and details of the hearing.
If no agreement is reached and a lender is still seeking an order for possession, a borrower should attend on the day of the hearing. A representative for the lender will also appear. They will be provided with up to date details as to the amount of arrears, the total amount left to pay under the mortgage and, if there have been any, recent payments.
You should try to speak with this person before the hearing. It may be possible to make a proposal to the lender for the repayment of arrears that may lead to an agreement before you go before a Judge. The representative may have instructions as to offers that would be acceptable to the lender, or they can contact the lender’s solicitors to put the proposal to them.
Also at Court, there may be a duty advisor, someone from the CAB, or a local authority or even from a local firm of solicitors. Provided your property is a residential property and not a commercial one, they may be able to provide you with advice and representation for free. The chance to discuss your case with the other side’s representative or a duty advisor, if present, is a good reason to ensure that you attend your hearing early.
If no agreement can be reached, you will have to go before a judge and argue your case to him.
The law on mortgage repossession
If a borrower is in arrears on their mortgage payments, the lender is entitled to a possession order, and a money judgment if this is sought. However, if the borrower can satisfy the Court that their mortgage can be paid and also clear their arrears within a reasonable period of time, the Court has a discretion not to make an outright possession order.
A reasonable period cannot be longer than the remaining term of the mortgage. Therefore, if your mortgage was 25 years taken out 2 years prior to the hearing, a reasonable period cannot be longer than 23 years. In reality, a judge may well wish to see the arrears cleared in a much shorter time.
The Court will typically make one of three orders on the hearing of a claim for possession;
The judge will need to be satisfied of a borrower’s ability to make the payments they are proposing to make. For example, if arrears accrued because the borrower was unemployed for a period of time, but they are now employed, a letter from their new employer, confirming their employment, start date and salary should be produced.
Therefore, where a Court is satisfied that the proposed payments will clear the arrears within a reasonable period of time, and that the payments are likely to be maintained, it will make a suspended possession order. If not, it will make an outright possession order.
If the Court makes an outright possession order, it will be for the lender to seek to enforce this order following the expiry of the period ordered by the Court. They may agree not to enforce where payments are made following the making of the order, or if evidence is provided that the borrower’s situation has changed since the hearing. Therefore, whilst a borrower should be prepared to leave the property following the making of an order, they should not be put off trying to negotiate or discuss the matter with the lender further if their circumstances change.
If their circumstances do change, but a lender will not agree not to enforce their order, the borrower can make an application to the Court.
Application to suspend an eviction
The lender can request bailiffs enter the property and evict a borrower where there is an outright possession order that has expired or where there is a suspended order that has been breached by the borrower. They do not need a further Court order.
The borrower can, however, apply to the Court that enforcement of the order be stayed/suspended on terms. Such an application may be necessary/desirable in the following examples;
These are just two examples. It is necessary to understand though that whilst a Court will often be minded to give a borrower a chance, the more times the matter comes back to Court due to a borrower’s failure to honour his promises to pay, the less likely it is the Court will exercise its discretion in favour of that borrower.